Author: Portia Iversen

Sources by Amanda Bach
Review:
Portia Iversen was an
award-winning art director and television writer
whose life changed irrevocably when her son Dov was
diagnosed with autism at the age of two. As she and
her husband, Jon Shestack, desperately sought
treatments for Dov and struggled to understand what
was happening to him, they were stunned to learn
that almost nothing was known about the disorder and
only a handful of researchers were even studying it.
Faced with little hope of a
medical breakthrough in Dov’s lifetime, Iversen and
her husband started the foundation Cure Autism Now,
knowing that speeding up the pace of autism research
might be the only meaningful thing they could do to
help their son.
While the foundation and autism
research took off, Dov remained profoundly autistic.
One day Iversen heard about a severely autistic
nonverbal boy in India whose mother had taught him
to read, write, and communicate. Soma Mukhopadhyay’s
methods were unorthodox and her tools surprisingly
simple —just a piece of cardboard with the alphabet
written on it— but her achievement was astonishing:
not only could Tito communicate, but he had an IQ of
185 and wrote beautiful poetry. Iversen realized
that Tito could provide an unrivaled window into
autism, and she organized a visit to the United
States for he boy and his mother and arranged for
some of the country’s top scientists to study him.
Strange Son is the captivating
account of these two families and how their personal
journeys into autism intersected for a time and
allowed Tito to explain to scientists the startling
differences in his sensory perception, giving them
insights that reframed the very definition of
autism. Iversen writes of her quest to understand
Soma’s teaching methods, of her own journey to learn
how to communicate with Dov, and of Soma’s success
in teaching hundreds of autistic children, posing
the possibility that this could be a new form of
communication as important as sign language or
Braille.
Strange Son is the powerful tale
of two mothers from opposite sides of the world who,
united by their fierce determination to help their
severely autistic sons, have challenged everything
we thought we knew about autism.
The following is an excerpt from the book "Strange
Son: Two Mothers, Two Sons, and the Quest to Unlock
the Hidden World of Autism"
by Portia Iversen
Published by Riverhead Books; January
2007;$24.95US/$31.00CAN; 978-1-57322-311-9
Copyright © 2006 Portia Iversen
1.
Departure of the Mind
There is a small group of people in this world to
whom an event so devastating has occurred that they
may even have stopped believing in God. Yet the one
characteristic those struck by lightning share is a
deep and persistent vulnerability to the possibility
of miracles. The very fact that something so
impossibly terrible could have happened makes the
chance of a miracle seem just as possible. Although
I didn’t recognize it in myself, I am certain it was
this vulnerability to miracles that was at work when
I first heard of Tito Mukhopadhyay.
It happened on a rainy spring day in 1999 at Rutgers
University in New Jersey where I was attending a
conference called Attention and Arousal in Autism
that I had organized for the Cure Autism Now
foundation. Our son Dov was seven years old.
“There’s a boy I think you should know about,”
Francesca Happe began, gesturing for me to sit down.
“His name is Tito.” The renowned psychologist from
England, whose specialty was autism, continued:
“He’s eleven years old and he lives in India. He’s
quite autistic, but he can read and write and he’s
very intelligent.”
She smiled at me and paused before going on, as if
to gauge my reaction.
“Tito is a wonderful poet as well,” she continued.
“He’s even published a book, an autobiography with
some of his poetry in it.”
“And he’s autistic?” I asked in disbelief, thinking
I must have misunderstood.
“Yes, he is definitely autistic.”
Francesca’s colleagues in England had heard about
this severely autistic boy in India whose mother had
taught him to communicate by pointing at letters on
a board. Of course they didn’t believe he could
really be autistic, since a profound deficit in the
ability to communicate was a hallmark of the
disorder. So they invited Tito and his mother to
England to be tested by experts and settle the
question of his autism once and for all. To their
astonishment, Tito fulfilled the diagnostic criteria
for autism beyond a doubt.
“Do you think there could be other autistic people
like Tito?” I asked Francesca, trying not to sound
too hopeful.
“There is only one Tito in this world, and no one
else like him. He is his own disorder,” she replied
with certainty.
I knew that no one had ever heard of such a severely
autistic person being able to write and communicate
independently. But wasn’t there even a remote chance
that there could be others who looked and acted just
like Tito but couldn’t communicate? At the very
least, couldn’t Tito provide an extraordinary window
into the most severe kind of autism?
As soon as the New Jersey conference was over, I
began e-mailing Francesca in England. I had to find
Tito. To my dismay, Francesca no longer had their
correct address and said her attempts to locate Tito
and his mother Soma in India had failed. She said
they kept moving because people were superstitious
about Tito and afraid of him. But I might be able to
get a copy of Tito’s book if I contacted the
National Autism Society of the United Kingdom, she
suggested. The BBC had made a documentary about Tito
when he was visiting England, although it was hard
to find.
Francesca did not understand. Finding Tito was not
optional. Finding Tito was a matter of life and
death. Or perhaps I should say it was like being
told that maybe, just maybe, you could bring someone
back from the dead.
Before Dov became autistic I used to be a sitcom
writer and before that I was an art director and a
set decorator. And, nearly twenty years ago, when I
first arrived in Hollywood in a pickup truck with my
six-year-old son, Billy, escaping a midwestern
winter and a lousy marriage, I dreamed of becoming a
filmmaker.
Being the land of dreams, it wasn’t long before I
landed my first job in Hollywood. It was called
craft services, a term I soon learned meant serving
coffee and cleaning up after the crew fourteen hours
a day.
And it wasn’t long before I met the man of my
dreams, a Jewish matinee-idol-handsome man on whom I
would have a crush for seven miserable years, before
his deeply neurotic indecisiveness allowed him to
choose me as the dreaded “friend for life.” This
term struck a chord of fear in his heart and cruelly
cut short his unrealized dreams of a sex-crazed
bachelor lifestyle, which he’d always been waiting
for, not that he had ever had one or ever would.
Still, it was the idea that he could, that I robbed
him of, by marrying him. By the time we actually did
get married, Jonathan was a struggling but mostly
working movie producer, I had won an Emmy for art
direction on the
Tracey Ullman Show,
Billy was thirteen years old, and I was five months
pregnant.
After our honeymoon, we moved into the lower unit of
a Spanish-style duplex in the mid-Wilshire district
of L.A. Jon and I spent our weekends window shopping
for the furniture we wished we could afford and
driving around town dreaming of the house we would
buy someday. We became even happier when our
extraordinarily beautiful baby boy Dov was born.
That summer, we met Jon’s parents at the Jersey
Shore for our vacation. We walked along the beach
holding hands with our little baby riding in a pack
on Jon’s shoulders while Billy ran alongside us,
drawing in the sand with a stick, and we were happy.
Jon and I talked about all the things we wanted to
do in life, about our careers and decorating our
house, about traveling and how many children we
wanted to have, imagining our idyllic future with an
optimism reserved for those who have never
experienced tragedy.
It’s hard to say exactly when we first suspected
something was wrong.
Babies do get fevers and babies can seem irritable
or lethargic after an immunization,
it’s true. But
as Dov lay in his crib, looking quiet and gray for
the next three days, I could hardly get him to nurse
at all. “Just a common reaction to the vaccination,”
Dr. Fleiss said over the phone reassuringly. But Dov
was never the same. He stopped gaining weight and
every time he nursed, he would writhe and cry,
flailing his skinny little arms as if nursing hurt
his stomach, and I often spent my afternoons sitting
in the doctor’s office. I knew something was wrong
with Dov and so did Dr. Fleiss. But no one knew what
it was or what to do.
By four months old, although Dov was still
breast-feeding, I could hardly get him to nurse for
more than a few minutes at a time. I tried to get
him to take a bottle, but he refused. He was barely
gaining weight and his stomach problems seemed to be
growing worse by the day. Then one day, to my
surprise, he suddenly chugged down a whole bottle of
soy formula. The next thing I knew, his face turned
gray, he projectile-vomited and lost consciousness.
It was the weekend, and luckily Jon was at home when
it happened. I couldn’t tell if Dov was breathing as
I held his limp little body in my arms on the way to
the hospital. I’d never been inside Children’s
Hospital of Los Angeles before. I had no idea what a
familiar place it was going to become.
“What did you give him?” a resident bellowed at us
as we carried him into the emergency room. Dov’s
white blood cell count was sky high. He’d had a
near-fatal reaction to something.
But what?
They hooked his tiny body up to a hundred tubes and
cords and a big light shone down on him. But no one
knew what was wrong, no one could figure out what
had happened to him. And no one ever did. After a
while he regained consciousness and they moved him
to a room. We stayed at the hospital for the next
three days. The thought that these events could have
anything to do with a developmental disorder never
crossed our minds.
What little impression I had of autism when Dov was
a baby came from a picture I’d glimpsed on the cover
of a magazine years earlier. It was a picture of a
boy who rocked in the corner all day, a boy who had
withdrawn into himself completely -- a condition
they called autism, which doctors mistakenly thought
was caused by bad parenting -- a belief that
tragically persisted for over fifty years,
devastating parents and preventing any kind of
advocacy or scientific research from getting under
way.
Jon was worried about Dov’s development long before
I was and I was angry at him for imagining such
terrible things, much less saying them out loud. Why
was he so being so negative?
Jon was a first-time dad. He needed to relax. Hadn’t
we heard a hundred times over that every child is
different? We needed to give Dov a chance to be who
he was and not compare him to other kids. We needed
to stop worrying so much.
Still, at night, after Jon was asleep, because I
didn’t want him to know, I pored through the baby
books, looking for things I saw Dov doing, or not
doing, that were beginning to worry me. But I
couldn’t find any descriptions that matched Dov’s
behavior. Maybe that meant they were insignificant,
silly, hysterical-parent worries, not even worthy of
mention in the Dr. Spock and Brazelton bibles of
baby and toddler development. Or maybe it meant they
were not so common -- serious, devastating things
that were too terrible to be listed. No, I told
myself, snapping the last book shut, I wasn’t going
down that path.
Ever since we were kids, my sister Sarah had an
intense fascination with Helen Keller and Annie
Sullivan, so when she told me she thought we should
get Dov’s hearing checked, I was alarmed. But I also
knew that Sarah could sometimes overreact and make a
big deal out of things.
Besides, Dov was not deaf. In fact, certain sounds
seemed to frighten him badly, like the vacuum
cleaner or the blender. But there
was
something strange about his hearing lately. It
seemed to have changed. Loud sounds like pot lids
banging didn’t seem to startle him at all and
sometimes he didn’t seem to hear his name being
called.
For the first time in months, I was actually looking
forward to seeing Dr. Fleiss. It was Dov’s
twelve-month checkup and by now most of his early
health problems had cleared up and he seemed stable.
I felt optimistic as I entered the craftsman-style
bungalow, with its rainbow-painted windows and
waiting room filled with mothers on corduroy couches
breast-feeding their babies. Dr. Fleiss’s practice
was a friendly, ’60s-style place. Just being there
made you feel like if you ate your veggies and
breast-fed, everything would be all right. I loved
hearing Dr. Fleiss’s reassuring voice as he
counseled his smallest patients: “I’m your doctor, I
make you feel all better.”
I set Dov down in the small examination room and
watched as he careened around, chattering away in
high-pitched sounds, to no one in particular. He was
wearing blue checked shorts that day and his blond
hair was cut in a bowl shape that swung to and fro
as he inspected every object in that tiny room. As I
sat there waiting, I tried to make a mental
checklist of the things that I was worried about and
the things Jon wanted me to ask Dr. Fleiss.
Dov had started shaking his head back and forth a
lot lately. And we’d noticed his cheeks turning red.
He was opening and closing the kitchen cabinets over
and over. It was harder to get his attention. He
seemed to have odd reactions to sounds. I kept
replaying the list in my mind to keep it from going
blank with nervousness.
At last, Dr. Fleiss came in to see us. I’d been
coming to him since Billy was a kid, his shaggy hair
and wire-rimmed glasses had probably not changed
since college. We talked for a few minutes as he
observed Dov and jotted down some notes.
“Jon is worried about Dov,” I started out. “I was
hoping you could reassure him that everything’s
okay.” Fleiss just kept writing, looking up over his
glasses at Dov and writing some more. I didn’t like
how much he was writing. And I didn’t like how long
he was taking to answer me.
Dr. Fleiss got down on his hands and knees and
started talking to Dov. But Dov didn’t seem to
notice Dr. Fleiss. He just kept running from toy to
toy, jabbering away and making high-pitched noises.
Dr. Fleiss followed Dov around the small room on all
fours, trying to get his attention, calling his
name, offering him a ball, even tickling him. I
wished Dov would just look at Dr. Fleiss, I wished
he would turn his head when Dr. Fleiss said his
name.
Dr. Fleiss stood up. “I think you should see a
specialist,” he said.
“What kind of a specialist?” I blurted out, in
shock.
“A developmental psychologist.”
“But why? What do you think is wrong?”
Fleiss thought for a moment. “He might have some
kind of a personality disorder.”
“What do you mean?” I asked, stricken.
Dr. Fleiss looked away. He seemed to be considering
his words carefully. “Sometimes we see these things.
The way he’s running around, making those sounds,
not connecting with people.”
“But isn’t that the way all one-year-olds act?” I
said defensively, suddenly knowing that it was not.
I left the little craftsman house that had once been
my refuge in the storm, shaken, with a small scrap
of paper in my hand. The number of a specialist to
call.
It was the Friday morning of Memorial Day weekend.
Four days during which all offices would be closed
and all experts, specialists, and other highly paid
miracle workers would not be available. But this was
an emergency.
I knew I should call Jon. But I couldn’t do it. I
would wait until he came home from work. I would let
him have a few more precious hours of not knowing. I
felt a sudden wave of relief. I had won a few more
hours before Dr. Fleiss’s dreadful pronouncement
would have to be shared with anyone. Before it would
spread and grow beyond the containment of my own
private fearful knowledge, to invade every part of
our lives, as I sensed it would.
I was so afraid. I needed to talk to someone. My
sister Lenore was a child psychiatrist. She would
know what to do. Lenore listened quietly as I told
her what Fleiss had said. How I wished she would
argue with me, say that Fleiss was out of his
league, out of his mind, anything but just listen
quietly. Lenore said she knew some specialists at
UCLA and she would try to get us in to see them as
soon as possible.
I looked down at my lap and saw that I was still
clutching the scrap of paper Fleiss had handed me,
with that terrible, damning name and number that
irreversibly linked us to those tragic worlds I did
not want to know about. But it was too late now, the
damage was done. This unlucky slip of paper with its
dreadful implications had already cast a shadow
across our lives and Dov’s future. How could he have
handed it to me so blithely, not thinking of the
consequences, the pain and suffering it would cause?
I hated Dr. Fleiss now.
Then slowly, as if someone else were prying open my
hand, I allowed the damp, crumpled piece of paper to
unfurl in my open palm, and, like a small bird, gave
it one last chance to fly away. And when it did not
alight, when it would not vanish or burst into
flames or blow away in a sudden gust of wind, only
then did I do the only thing left to do. I smoothed
it out, releasing the black hex that was embedded in
those words and numbers, and I dialed Dr. Arthur
Rosenberg, the developmental psychologist.
We were lucky to get a phone appointment with Dr.
Rosenberg over the holiday weekend, his receptionist
told me. But I did not feel lucky at all. The call
was set for Saturday afternoon, the next day.
I broke the news to Jon that night. We couldn’t stop
talking because the silence scared us. We worried
and argued, we agreed and disagreed, we panicked and
soothed, we fought and made up, we did and said
everything we could think of until we ran dry and
just sat there, watching Dov sleep in his sweet
one-year-old unknowingness.
The next afternoon, we called Dr. Rosenberg. A
nondescript voice answered at the other end of the
line. A generic picture snapped into my mind --
tweed jacket, brown hair, fiftyish -- more than I
needed to know. We thanked Dr. Rosenberg for talking
to us and immediately launched into all the things
we had discussed endlessly through the long night,
cataloging what worried us about Dov. We talked on
top of each other, we interrupted each other, we
finished each other’s sentences. Breathless and
intent, all the while hoping we were being complete
idiots, we exhausted every worry, paired with every
explanation, that we could produce for the doctor in
the course of one phone call, until at last there
was nothing left to say.
“It sounds like autism,” Dr. Rosenberg said finally.
“What do we do about that?” Jon blurted out,
incredulous.
Dr. Rosenberg cleared his throat and answered
slowly, deliberately, without emotion, as if he were
prescribing an ordinary painkiller, which I suppose
he was: “Just hold on to each other and cry. Get on
with your lives.”
Hold on to each other? We weren’t even in the same
room, for God’s sake. Didn’t he realize we were on
separate phones? And, although I could not see him,
I knew Jon was crying. And I was sure he knew that I
was crying too, although our tears were the quiet
kind. I was glad we couldn’t see each other because
it was too sad and it wouldn’t help us to see each
other falling apart this way. We were going to have
to be strong, stronger than we had ever been in our
lives, and we both knew it.
Later that night, we did hold on to each other as
tightly as we could, and for a long time we clung to
each other and just stood there. But no matter what,
we were not going to take that doctor’s advice.
Maybe we would cry, it was so hard not to, but we
would not just get on with our lives.
The first person we went to see was Dr. Shelly, an
elegant and kindly white-haired woman, recommended
by an analyst we knew. She was a developmental
psychologist who recommended play therapy. Jon began
taking afternoons off work and we drove across town
to the Palisades where Dov had play therapy twice a
week. Dr. Shelly had a room full of toys that were
supposed to make children get better: teapots for
the pretend play that Dov wasn’t doing and little
dolls for the social behavior that was not emerging.
She told us to hold off on going to UCLA for a
diagnosis. Maybe Dov would start to get better. We
liked the sound of that; it was hopeful and
reassuring. But as the months passed, Dov didn’t
seem to be getting better. In fact he was getting
worse. He no longer turned when we called his name
and instead of running to Jon, he preferred to stare
at the specks of dust suspended in the shaft of
light that came through the door when his father
came home.
We saw a developmental pediatrician, a child
psychiatrist, a pediatric neurologist, a metabolic
geneticist, a chiropractor, and a naturopath. Dov
had blood tests and an EEG.
But no one knew what to do and no one was quite as
certain that Dov was autistic as Dr. Rosenberg had
been on that first phone call.
As the weeks grew into months we were sucked into a
gray tunnel of time, waiting for some kind of
pronouncement that would end our unbearable state of
not knowing; waiting for those few words of advice
that could either lift the curse off our lives or
bring our world crashing down. This was not normal
sequential time, it was the painful, agonizing,
slowed-down kind of time that occurs when panic
intersects with endless waiting.
Every day Jon got up and went to work and tried to
do his job. And every day I took care of Dov and
played with him and tried to get his attention and
hoped that he would get better. I dreaded the
ringing of the phone because I could not explain to
anyone what was happening to us. Yet somehow life
went on and although we didn’t know it, I was
already pregnant with our daughter, Miriam.
Dov was eighteen months old when we finally went in
for a diagnostic workup at UCLA. It was dark and hot
in the tiny room where I stood and watched from
behind a one-way mirror as they tested Dov. Jon was
in there with him, sitting on a tiny child’s chair,
holding on to Dov as they tried to test him. They
had been testing him for more than two hours when I
saw they were letting Dov out of the room and I knew
they were done. Jon stood up and scooped up Dov, and
he stared for a moment at the mirror, where he knew
I was watching.
“Autism,” the doctor finally said.
“Autism?” I repeated. I wanted to scream at them:
“That’s impossible. Einstein didn’t talk until he
was five. Thomas Edison didn’t either, and they were
both geniuses. Most boys talk late, everyone says
that. Dov’s grandfather is an accomplished attorney,
the stoic type, always reading briefs or writing
them in his head, not that sociable, it could just
be a personality trait that runs in the family. Big
deal.” But I said nothing.
“What should we do?” Jon asked, breaking the
silence.
“There are special schools,” the doctor replied.
“Isn’t there anything else we could do?” Jon
persisted. “Special diets, vitamins, therapies?”
“We don’t usually tell parents to do those things,”
the doctor said. “We don’t want to give you false
hope.”
Outside in the brightness of the hospital hallway, I
broke down and wept on Jon’s shoulder while Dov ran
up and down the corridor, making high-pitched
shrieking sounds, never tiring. “If he had cancer,”
I sobbed, “at least we would know what to do.”
The day after our visit to the UCLA clinic, I
carried Dov into the Cheerful Helpers group for the
last time. Cheerful Helpers was a Mommy and Me group
where a few “at-risk” toddlers were included to be
carefully watched by specialists for signs of
developmental delay. I’d been taking Dov to the
group for about six months and now, for the first
time, I allowed myself to admit that he wasn’t doing
the same things as the other children. He wasn’t
playing purposefully with toys, or pointing to
things, and he wasn’t coming to me for help. He made
lots of sounds but he never said “Mama,” or anything
else that resembled a word. I didn’t know that his
failure to point or wave were classic signs of
autism.
I hoped the group had forgotten that Dov’s
evaluation was yesterday. At last, the hour passed
and everyone was starting to clean up. The moment I
had been avoiding all morning hadn’t happened. I was
sitting on the edge of one of those big cement
planters, zipping up Dov’s sky blue windbreaker,
when the program director, the cheerfulest helper of
all, with the pink lipstick and the degree in
psychology and the three normal children, asked,
“How did it go?”
Instinctively, I picked up Dov. “They said . . .” I
started out, hoping I could stay calm. I would not
let this woman see me fall apart. And yet how could
I say it and not fall to pieces? “They said he has
something, he has a pervasive developmental
disorder.” The Cheerful Helper gazed sadly at me and
said nothing.
“It’s not autism,” I said quickly, instantly
regretting it, but unable to stop myself from
continuing, “It’s . . . well, a lot of kids have it
these days.”
The Cheerful Helper pursed her lips in a half smile,
or a half frown, I couldn’t tell which. Her
perfectly shaped eyebrows gathered slightly in the
middle, in an expression that said,
Sorry to hear that,
What a shame, Too bad, better than any
words ever could.
“They say there are therapies, special schools.” I
added urgently. But I could not go on. I had started
to cry and I hated it when people saw me crying.
Especially here, holding Dov. They must know by now,
just by looking at me, what had happened yesterday.
I looked at the faces that had already started to
gather around, then I looked at the blue sky and the
medical towers and the clouds that were not moving,
and I ran out of there.
After the diagnosis, I did what I always did when I
was in trouble -- I turned to books. I have a lot of
faith in books of every kind. If the library was a
sanctuary in my childhood, the bookstore was a
church. For it was there, my mother taught me, that
you could turn for help in your darkest moments,
reaching out to the almighty pyramid-shaped displays
of self-help paperbacks whose titles changed weekly.
It was there that my mother, who was widowed at
thirty-one with four children under the age of
seven, never failed to find answers to just about
everything in life.
Autism, I discovered, would be a different story.
For the first time in my life, I could not find the
answers I needed in any book.
“So I guess autism is when you can’t do anything?”
Billy asked as much as said one day when he was
fourteen. Billy was trying to understand the
terrible thing that had turned our household and our
lives upside down; the thing that had stolen away
the baby brother he used to know. “They don’t really
know what it is,” I said miserably, wishing I had a
better explanation.
In the first few years that followed Dov’s diagnosis
at UCLA, the Spanish duplex we lived in became
filled to the limit with new life and with autism.
Billy’s room was crammed with teenage stuff like
mannequins and music posters, and the rest of the
place was bursting with baby furniture, toys, and
books. Autism-related paperwork covered the dining
room and kitchen tables and every other surface in
the house. Therapeutic toys and special swings and a
minitrampoline crowded Dov’s room and spilled out
into the hallway, and an endless stream of
therapists, baby-sitters, and housekeepers came and
went all day long. By the time Dov was diagnosed,
his sister, Miriam, was born, followed by Gabriel,
three years later. Billy moved out as soon as he was
old enough to get his own apartment. I can’t say I
blame him; our lives were one big emergency with no
end in sight.
When Dov was eight years old, we bought the
wonderful old house we live in now. It had been a
convent for fifty years before we moved in, and I
secretly hoped that all the praying that took place
there might hasten the miracles we were working and
praying for now. There is a sun porch that joins our
bedroom and Dov’s room; the walls are painted an
intensely bright color called mango. This is where I
have spent much of my time these past several years,
surrounded by books and scientific journals, at my
computer, searching through databases and across the
Internet for the right molecules, the right genes,
the right concepts, but most of all trying to find
the researchers who will figure out autism. And yet
I am certain that if I had not met Soma and Tito, I
would never have found Dov.
Just about the time Dov was born, Soma must have
been dragging Tito from doctor to doctor in India,
in search of a diagnosis. And probably, just as I
was taking Dov from specialist to specialist, Soma
must have just begun to succeed at getting Tito to
communicate. And probably, just as I might have been
eating a mango at my kitchen table, Soma may have
visited her childhood home and sat in the courtyard
shaded by the mango trees, real mango trees -- the
Alfanso type, not Langra mangos like we have here,
according to Soma.
Probably just as I was selecting this very color for
these very walls, Soma could have been standing
under a mango tree, waiting for a bus, in India,
with her son Tito, carrying a sheaf of his poetry
under her arm. And probably Tito must have written
“Mutilated Spirit” right before we met each other.
Mutilated spirit still breathes in
Moment by moment
Mutilated spirit still breathes out
Event after event.
Every event gets counted within
One and two and three
As the moments pass unstill
Under the mango tree.
--From the poem: “Mutilated Spirit,”
by Tito Mukhopadhyay
Copyright © 2006 Portia Iversen
About Author:
Portia Iversen,
an Emmy-winning art director, has been a vigorous
proponent of autism research since her son Dov was
diagnosed in 1994. Together with her husband, Jon
Shestack, she established the Cure Autism Now
Foundation, one of the largest nongovernmental
funding resources for autism research worldwide. She
lives in Los Angeles with her family.
For more information, please visit
www.strangeson.com
Strange Son

A Conversation with
Portia Iversen
Author of STRANGE SON
1.) When and how did you
recognize that your son Dov is autistic?
We knew something was wrong by the
time he was about ten months old, but we didn’t know
what. When Dov was twenty-one months old we received a
diagnosis of autism from UCLA. We were told not to have
“false hope” and were sent on our way. It was the most
devastating thing that has ever happened in my life.
2.) Before Dov was diagnosed
with autism, you were an Emmy-winning art director for
television. But essentially gave up your professional
career in order to establish and run the Cure Autism Now
Foundation (CAN). How did you manage to do that –
financially, logistically, emotionally, and in every
other way?
It was like a force was driving me
– something that you couldn’t resist even if you tried –
a force of nature, you might say. The funny thing is,
it’s not something extraordinary at all, actually. All
parents have it – basically you’ll do anything to save
your child. It’s a deep instinct. Parents of autistic
children are always searching for anything
that could possibly help their child get better, and
they never stop, they never give up. And part of that
is the unrelenting search for the cause of their child’s
autism; they need to know what stole that child away
from them. What happened to him? Why did he disappear?
Some parents actually have children who are already two
or even three years old and seem completely normal when
suddenly, out of nowhere, the child stops talking,
starts exhibiting bizarre behaviors and in months or
even weeks they have disappeared from our world
completely. It’s unbearable really. It goes against the
human heart and against all reason. Life doesn’t make
sense anymore when this happens to your child. Logic
falls apart and you have to find answers to make your
universe, your thought process hold together. It is so
profoundly unacceptable, so cruel and illogical, so
unbearable and tragic. And all the while, your child is
in front of you, he is still there but you can no longer
reach him. Of course you feel this driving need to
understand what happened and to save your child. But
from what? That is the question that has dominated my
thoughts every day and night for the past decade.
3.) You also threw yourself into
learning the science behind autism, even though you did
not have a scientific background.
At the time I threw myself into it,
there was not much science behind autism at all. I was
naïve, I thought the government, scientists, were
working on all diseases fairly and equally. When Dov
was diagnosed, of course I wanted to know what research
was going on - and there was really almost none. That
was a shock to me – and it’s one of the main reasons my
husband, Jon Shestack, and I started the Cure Autism Now
Foundation (CAN). We knew that if there wasn’t any
research going on, there wouldn’t be help for Dov in his
lifetime.
4.) Did it surprise you that
your motivation to find treatment or a cure for your son
was so strong?
What surprised me was that I had
any capacity at all to learn science. I was terrible at
math and science as a student; I was an art major in
college and I avoided those subjects. But when Dov was
diagnosed with autism, suddenly I was incredibly
interested in science - because I knew that was where
the answers were going to come from. They said that
autism was “incurable” – that’s what they told us about
Dov – but it didn’t make sense. How could you proclaim
that a disease we understood nothing about was
incurable? How could you know that was true? It didn’t
make logical sense. Science became an extremely
relevant subject for me – all those mysterious terms and
concepts suddenly seemed very interesting, a gold mine
of possibility. And autism seemed like a completely
untapped field to me. And this was at a time when we
were reading about a new miracle or cure for disorders
nearly every day. People do strange things when it’s a
matter of life or death. They say you can lift a car
off someone you love. Science was my version of that
car.
5.) How did you first learn
about Tito and his remarkable abilities, and about Soma
and her revolutionary teaching method?
I had organized a conference at
Rutgers University in New Jersey – the topic was
“attention and arousal in autism,” which is something
that has interested me for a long time. And I met a
British psychologist there, Francesca Happe, a very
conservative type – and she took me aside and said,
“There’s a boy you should know about.” And then she told
me about Tito.
You have to understand that even
today, the commonly held belief is that 80% of autistics
are retarded. And of course autism is a disorder defined
by lack of the ability to communicate. So when
Francesaca told me she had met an 11-year-old boy from
India who was nonverbal and had classic autistic
behaviors and yet had an IQ of 185 and not only
communicated but wrote poetry – well, I was astonished.
How could this be true? And I wondered if he was really
autistic, of course. But Francesca said he definitely
was and they had tested him in England and he met all
the criteria for a diagnosis of autism. I believed her
because I knew how conservative she was.
Once I’d heard of Tito, I tried to
track him down as if my life depended on it. Because IF
someone who acted like my son Dov could have
intelligence, then maybe there was a chance Dov could,
too. Even if it was a one-in-a-million chance, still
I’d never had the privilege of even entertaining such a
possibility until I heard about Tito.
6.) What was so different about
Tito compared to other autistic people?
Tito may not actually be so
different than many other people with autism. Not that
they are all poets and writers! What I mean is, maybe
it was his mother Soma and the unique teaching method
she developed that was one in a million. Maybe there are
a lot more Titos in this world, only without a Soma to
help them break through and join our world.
There have been some other
cases of nonverbal people with autism typing –
communicating – but there is a history of doubt and
skepticism surrounding these cases, because they were
less independent in their typing.
7.) Why was Tito different?
There had never been a person so
severely affected by autism as Tito who could type and
hand write so independently. When you see Tito writing
words and sentences in his own handwriting, with a
pencil, you know it’s him. There can be no doubt. Not
that those other people weren’t for real, too – but they
were not acceptable to the skeptics, not as independent
as Tito. That may not be fair, but what Tito did was to
get beyond the skepticism of some scientists and give us
the chance to ask the kind of questions we have never
been able to ask before – about how the autistic mind
functions, from sensory input, to mental representations
and cognitive style, to emotion and abstract thinking.
Tito could shed light on all those questions by
providing researchers with clear, concise answers about
how his brain worked. In some ways Tito could tell us
more about the autistic brain than any neuroimaging
technology could ever reveal.
8.) The story of Tito and Soma
and Dov is a groundbreaking reexamination of autism that
suggests critical new avenues of scientific research to
be pursued. What is currently being done to pursue
these new avenues of research?
What I describe in my book is a
very new idea about autism that hasn’t really been
studied much yet, and it deserves to be. I believe that
there are many autistic children and adults who are
nonverbal and thought to be retarded but are not. This
view of autism is both wonderful and distressing because
it means the “experts” have been very wrong about autism
for a long time and many people with autism have
suffered in silence while it was thought they understood
nothing, knew nothing, and had no
feelings. Clinical and educational
studies need to be conducted that explore how and why
the method I describe works. CAN supported the very
beginnings of these kinds of studies by bringing Soma
and Tito to the United States to work with scientists,
and CAN has been the first to fund a study of this type
of communication method. CAN recently funded a study of
a method originated by Marion Blank at Columbia
University in New York, which is a program that has many
similarities to Soma’s method – it teaches nonverbal
children to become literate, to read, type and handwrite
and in some cases speak. We also funded Mike Merzenich’s
lab at University of California San Francisco to work on
developing neural retraining tools for kids with
autism. The treatment side is going to require a
practical approach, meaning the development and
standardization of practical skills -- something like
Braille or sign language require.
9.) What are the obstacles to
doing so? How can they be overcome?
There are several challenges. The
first one is skepticism. As has happened historically
with breakthroughs in other disabilities, in the
beginning there are always skeptics, people who are more
interested in proving that these kids can’t think
than in exploring how and why they can think in
spite of their outward behavior. Then there is the real
science. Investigating autism has been a very tough
road, and this new information makes it even more
confounding – and much more urgent than ever, as there
is a mind to save. We need to throw out the current
belief that the majority of autistic people are
retarded. Most of our current beliefs about autism are
incorrect, and research continues to be misguided by
these wrong assumptions. Then there is the challenge of
defining and describing this new method of communication
and making it accessible to everyone; it is my hope that
my book will be a start toward this.
10.) What are some of Tito’s
accomplishments and interests?
Tito is a remarkable writer. He is
a true poet in the purest sense; the muse is always with
him. He never procrastinates, he’s a very prolific
writer and he writes beautifully. There is a purity and
sincerity to Tito’s poetry that is rare. Tito loves
literature and music. He became a published author at
age 11. And recently, the American edition of his book
“The Mind Tree” was published and also a book of prose
called “The Gold of the Sunbeams.” Tito has written
literally hundreds of poems and stories. He has a wry
wit and a wonderful sense of humor. He is compassionate
and caring and sensitive – everything that is supposed
to be absent in people with autism.
What we have learned from Tito
tells us that our understanding of autism is all wrong.
I hope my book will begin to change the way people think
about people with autism.
11.) Your foundation brought
Tito and Soma to the United States, where he was tested
by many scientists. How did their discoveries about
Tito challenge accepted scientific notions of autism?
Some of the main characteristics
that are believed to define autism – a lack of desire
for social connection, a lack of empathy and theory of
mind, a lack of language and communication – Tito
clearly demonstrates; although he may appear aloof and
disconnected, he is very present both cognitively and
emotionally. It was clear that Tito had very advanced
language abilities, contrary to the current beliefs
about autism. And yet to look at Tito and his behavior
from the outside – you realize that if he were not able
to communicate through writing, no one would ever
suspect the intelligent being that exists beneath the
façade of autistic behaviors. In addition, Tito
revealed through testing that the more he concentrated
on something, the more his senses split apart. In other
words, if he was looking at you, he couldn’t hear your
voice. Hearing became Tito’s dominant sense early in
life, to the point where he used his eyes so little that
he might almost be described as blind.
Another thing Tito told us, which
no one had ever heard before, was that he flaps his
hands and rocks in order to feel his body. He says he
cannot feel his body, and this motion calms him down.
This led to further studies of the somatosensory maps
(these are maps representing your body in your brain) of
children with autism. Tito has made an amazing
contribution to our understanding of autism. Just
because someone doesn’t look at your eyes doesn’t mean
he doesn’t like people or that he doesn’t have emotions
and feelings or empathy. Tito has those attributes and
I think most autistic people do. It’s a natural human
drive to want to be with people, to want to have
friends, and autistic people are no exception. That’s
good news because wanting to have friends is something
you can’t teach a person.
12.) How did Soma manage to
break through to Tito?
From what Soma told me, when Tito
was a toddler she noticed him staring at the calendar –
he seemed fascinated by it. Now, anyone else would have
tried to stop him, because this was not normal
behavior. But not Soma. Instead she saw this as a way
of capturing Tito’s attention. She decided to try to
see if Tito knew what number came between two other
numbers in a set sequence – like two comes between one
and three. But first she showed him the most
rudimentary thing: how to point at the answer if he did
know it. This was her genius. And he did know. Once
she realized he could identify and then show her that he
knew this by pointing, she set about teaching him
numbers and then she moved on to letters. She used an
ordinary phonics method to teach him reading. I believe
she established a kind of calibration, allowing Tito to
share in “joint attention” for the first time in his
life. Joint attention is where two people are referring
to something and sharing in some sort of understanding
of it and also knowing that they are doing so. Autistic
children seem to lack this most basic synchronization
with other people. We take it for granted because it is
so natural, so basic. But Soma didn’t and that was her
genius.
13.) What was your reaction when
you first saw that Soma succeed in getting Dov to
communicate? And what did you feel when you realized
that he had an intact mind and in fact understood very
well what was being said to him and what was going on
around him?
Shock, then joy, then guilt.
Wonder. It really felt like a miracle. It shook up my
world, my thinking, everything I thought I knew. It
didn’t seem possible. Honestly, it was more than I had
ever dared to hope for. When your child has reached age
nine and hasn’t developed language or normal cognitive
ability – well, you imagine it will be a long, slow road
toward gaining those things. To discover a hidden mind,
especially in your own child, is at once both shocking,
deeply disturbing and joyous.
14.) Can you describe what
happened when you brought Dov back to his school for
autistic children after he had been working with Soma
for a while? What was the teacher’s reaction to Dov’s
newly discovered cognitive ability? How did the other
children react?
His teachers were astounded and
fascinated and they were determined to learn Soma’s
method. I arranged for Soma to become a volunteer at
Dov’s school and she worked with each of the nine
autistic
students in his class once a week.
In a matter of weeks, all of them had begun to point to
one degree or another and all were showing cognitive
skills beyond what anyone ever suspected.
15.) What did the other
children’s response suggest to you scientifically? In
other words, what were the implications for our
understanding of the nature of autism?
It suggested that whatever happens
to the brain during development that leads to autism,
that process is somehow leaving the cortex - the
thinking part of the brain -- intact. In other words, it
suggested that many of these children probably do have
an intact mind that is hidden from view and that Soma’s
method was probably a really big deal, on a par with
Braille or sign language. The challenge I was faced with
was to understand Soma’s method well enough to learn it
myself and then to be able to codify it into a form that
could become widely accessible. I spent more than two
years studying Soma and her method and interviewing her
about it.
16.) Soma’s remarkable success
with Tito and Dov also suggests that her revolutionary
treatment method needs to be shared with other teachers,
therapists, and parents.
Yes, that is why I wrote my book –
I believe there are a lot of people with autism out
there who could have a better life and receive a
meaningful education if they had access to this method.
17.) What is being done to
facilitate this?
I have started a small foundation
to support documentation and study of these methods;
it’s called the Descartes Institute. Descartes said, “I
think, therefore I am,” and that’s how I see these
children – they exist in their minds, they are thinking
and yet nobody realizes it: They have no way to let
anyone know that they have intelligence and feelings and
that they’re aware of everything around them. I also
started a small school to develop an educational
approach that incorporates this kind of communication
method. Soma also started a foundation of her own
called HALO (www.halo-soma.org). She sees children
individually and also holds training sessions for
parents and therapists.
18.) There are more than one
million autistic people in the United States.
Currently, one out of every 166 children in this country
is being diagnosed with autism; some are even calling it
an epidemic. How many of these children do you think
are like your son Dov, with a hidden intelligence?
No one knows yet why there has been
such an incredible increase in autism, but we do know
that genes are definitely involved, so autism is
probably a lot like many other of the “modern” diseases
like diabetes, hypertension, obesity – susceptibility
genes that are interacting with environmental influences
to cause it. But one thing we know for sure is that
there are a lot more people with autism than anyone
realized. What we call autism is probably more than one
thing. If I had to guess, I’d say that the majority of
people with autism probably do have a mind that is far
more intelligent that we are aware of, if only we could
get to it. That is the job we have at hand.
19.) Less money is spent for
research into autism than into many other diseases.
What is the current state of funding for autism
research, both public and private? What are the major
organizations in autism research? How can they be
better supported?
When my son was diagnosed about
twelve years ago, the federal government was spending
almost nothing at all on autism research. That’s
because when autism was first described in the 1940s and
for fifty years after that, scientists wrongly blamed
parents for their children’s autism. You can imagine
this didn’t do much for raising money or for advocacy.
Since my husband Jon and I started the CAN Foundation
about eleven years ago, all that has changed
significantly. There has been an incredible rise in
awareness and interest in autism and especially among
scientists. And as the result of parents pressuring the
National Institutes of Health, government funding has
increased significantly, too. But not enough, not
anywhere near where it should be when you consider that
autism is one of the most common developmental disorders
and yet remains one of the least funded.
Recently our organization joined
forces with a group called Autism Speaks and together we
are continuing to push for more government research
funding, and of course we’ll be continuing to raise
funds for research ourselves. Anyone who cares about
autism can contact us to support research or volunteer;
we have several national walks people can participate
in. The causes of autism will be figured out by
scientists who are alive today, and I think we would all
like to speed that up as much as possible!
20.) What questions about the
nature of autism have been raised by Tito and Dov and
Soma’s method and remain to be answered?
I can think of many. Here are just
a few: How can mind and behavior develop along such
completely separate trajectories as they seem to in
people like Tito and Dov? How is it that autistic
children such as Tito and Dov become literate long
before they can use language to communicate? How can
they possess a capacity for language without being able
to use it to mediate human interaction? And on a practical level, how can we
reliably establish joint attention, as Soma has done,
with autistic children? How can we create a bridge
through literacy toward communication? Where can we
begin to therapeutically bridge the developmental gap
between behavior and mind in these kids? How can we
disseminate this new understanding of autism?
21.) What kind of research is
your foundation sponsoring that will help answer those
questions?
CAN is funding a study at Columbia
University in New York right now that is looking at a
technique similar to Soma’s. The technique was
pioneered by Marion Blank and has been very successful.
The fact that a program paralleling Soma’s exists
confirms the universality of this communication method.
CAN also has a special program called Innovative
Technology for Autism that supports research in the use
of technology for education and communication in autism.
22.) How can people help support
research into autism?
They can make a donation to CAN or
get involved in our national walks.
23.) What are the main
challenges that still face people like Tito and Dov,
even though they have learned to communicate with help
from others?
The challenges are enormous,
overwhelming even. In spite of the fact that Dov has
normal intelligence, he still needs help with just about
everything in life, from taking a bath to holding his
letter board for him so he can
answer a question. He even needs help having a friend
because he cannot talk or behave in ways that
demonstrate friendship other than giving a simple hug
and communicating by typing. This is very limiting
socially. And he still suffers periodically, as Tito
did, from terrible manic episodes that make his life a
living hell of obsessions and repetitive behaviors and
interferes with every aspect of his daily activities,
which make education impossible. He still cannot speak,
though he desperately wants to. There is a very long way
to go. And yet, I am able to know Dov now, we have a
relationship, and I have access to his wonderful mind.
That is still a lot better than it was before when he
could not even nod to say yes or no.
24.) The Cure Autism Now (CAN)
Foundation is building up the world’s largest gene bank
of DNA samples of autistic people and their families to
facilitate research. Previously this data had been
collected in relatively small samples and carefully
guarded as proprietary information by researchers. How
can research into the possible genetic basis of autism
be speeded up?
Funding is what can make things
move faster. We established an autism gene bank that is
open to the entire scientific community as an open
resource. Before we did that, samples were being
hoarded and the field was paralyzed by that. It cost
millions to create our gene bank, and parents raised
that money; now it is the largest autism gene bank in
the world. Our gene bank has enabled researchers
worldwide to work on autism who would never have been
able to otherwise – because it is simply too costly for
any individual to collect the number of samples needed
to do these kinds of genetic studies. Another way of
helping to speed up this research is that families with
more than one member with autism should contact us and
participate directly in the gene bank program.
25.) Where are Tito and Soma
now? How are they doing?
Soma and Tito live in Austin,
Texas, and Soma has a nonprofit organization called
HALO, where she works with kids one on one and also
gives training sessions for those wishing to learn her
method. Tito is in school and he is still writing and
seeking out publication.
26.) How did Dov’s autism affect
your relationship with your husband and your other three
children?
It basically has made our lives
revolve around it. We had no choice but to do what we
had to do to help Dov. I think every member of our
family agrees on that. It’s definitely taken time away
from our other kids and from Jon and I as a couple, but
at the same time it unites us in a deep and meaningful
way.
27.) You write of the tremendous
strains placed upon your marriage and your family by
your son’s autism – emotional, financial, and otherwise.
How does autism affect other families? What
resources exist to help families of autistic children
care for themselves, as well as their autistic
children?
There still isn’t a lot of help out
there. It’s shocking, really, that in this country
health insurance companies are allowed to refuse to
cover autism. It’s a holdover from when parents were
blamed for it and autism was thought to be an emotional
condition. That puts the burden of treatment and
education on the taxpayer, and that’s not fair. I don’t
know how medical insurance companies continue to get away with it. Local and federal
support vary greatly across the country, but most places
it is dismal, with little or no support available for
families and a continuous legal battle to get an
appropriate education for your child with autism. You
become overwhelmed with the sheer number of battles you
must fight for your child every day and for years on
end. So you pick your battles, and for Jon and I we
chose to focus on pushing the scientific research ahead.
We felt that was the biggest thing we could do for Dov.
When I learned that Dov had normal
intelligence when he was already nine years old – that
made the battle to find treatment and a cure for his
autism all the more urgent. It is heartbreaking to see
him growing up unable to function in the most basic
ways, knowing that he is thinking and understanding
everything around him. I feel terrible that we haven’t
been able to do more for him yet – I promised him a
future. In my darker moments I wonder: Will he always
need people to help him with everything? Will he always
have to wait for someone to help him start typing as he
struggles to express himself? He is definitely smart
enough to go to college, but will he be able to control
his behavior enough to not disrupt the class? Will he be
able to sustain communication long enough to write the
lengthy papers that are required? The truth is, if I
didn’t believe things will keep getting better, that
research will give us answers in the form neural
retraining techniques and pharmaceuticals and that the
new communication methods pioneered by Soma will become
better understood, refined and further developed, I
wouldn’t be here today. And I wouldn’t have written the
book.
28.) How is Dov doing? And how
is the rest of your family?
Dov is doing very well. I’ve had a
home school for him for the past three years. There are
three students in our school and we use the pointing
method. It’s been a very good experience. And there was
really no other way for Dov to get an appropriate
education – with his extremely uneven development –
exhibiting the behaviors of a very young child often and
yet possessing the intelligence and the mind of a
14-year-old. Thinking is what Dov does well, and not
much else, so I felt it was essential to provide him
with a school where he could not only learn at his age
level but also have the opportunity to demonstrate the
fine mind that he has.
29.) The film rights for your
book have been optioned for Julia Roberts. What stage
is the project in now?
Bruce Joel Rubin has written the
screenplay -- it’s a wonderful script I think. It can be
scary to have someone else writing about your life, your
family, but he did a great job. He was very sensitive
about our feelings and especially toward Dov. We’ve
become friends. Nigel Cole is attached as the director.
I hope the movie gets made – it could definitely have a